Eggonomics: The Ethical Implications of Providing Private Party Egg Donor Compensation
Keywords:
Egg donation, compensation, in vitro fertilizationAbstract
This essay explores the ethical issues surrounding the United States' liberal policy toward private party egg donor compensation. It identifies two ethically differentiable types of compensation: burden-based compensation and desired-trait compensation, and systematically explores the arguments for and against each type. After a discussion of issues such as the wealth-based disparities between egg seekers and donors, the undermining of informed consent, the commodification of children, and the sociopsychological consequences of rewarding those with ";;;desirable";;; traits, the essay ultimately concludes that, in light of the potential social harms of a system of desired-trait compensation, a policy of burden-based compensation may be less ethically problematic.Downloads
Published
2009-09-28
Issue
Section
Comments
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).