Psychological Dimensions of Digital Disinformation in International Relations
Abstract
Digital disinformation poses a growing threat to international relations by exploiting psychological vulnerabilities within modern information environments. This study examines key cognitive and emotional mechanisms including confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, emotional arousal, and social identity dynamics that increase individuals’ susceptibility to misleading information. Drawing upon interdisciplinary scholarship in psychology, political science, communication studies, and technology research, the article analyzes how these psychological processes interact with digital media systems and geopolitical information strategies.
The paper further investigates how state and non-state actors deploy disinformation campaigns in contemporary geopolitics through mechanisms such as election interference, pandemic misinformation, and algorithmic amplification of narratives. Case studies including Russian electoral interference, misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, targeted social media campaigns, and artificial intelligence generated deepfake media illustrate how digital propaganda can influence public perceptions and political discourse (Woolley & Joseff, 2020; Brown, 2024; Bronovytska, 2024).
The analysis highlights the interdisciplinary nature of digital disinformation and emphasizes that the phenomenon cannot be understood solely as a technological problem. Instead, it must be examined as a socio-psychological process shaped by cognitive biases, emotional responses, identity formation, and digital communication systems. The article concludes with policy recommendations including psychological inoculation strategies, expanded media and information literacy programs, international cooperation on regulatory norms, and responsible platform governance. These measures aim to strengthen democratic resilience against the global spread of digital disinformation.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
All the data and materials used in this research are drawn from publicly accessible academic journals, credible institutional reports, and verified online sources. I did not generate or collect any primary data for this study. Every source referenced in the article is properly cited and can be accessed through the links provided in the bibliography. Readers are welcome to consult these sources directly for further exploration.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
