‘Neuralizing’ Injustice: How neuroscience misunderstands racism, addiction, and crime
Abstract
The science of the brain has emerged to the forefront of public thought and policy regarding many social issues, enabled by technological advancements in cognitive neuroscience and psychology. While this research presents exciting possibilities for informing social activism and policy, centering neuroscientific explanations for complex social issues often obscures social injustices not easily measurable with neuroscientific tools. Here, I discuss neuroscientific and psychological research into racism, drug addiction, and criminality that has 1) ‘over-individualized’ these issues by neglecting structural and environmental complexities,, and 2) ‘over-neuralized’ these issues by reducing them to neural phenomena, inscribing historical injustices into the ‘hardwiring’ of the brain under a veneer of scientific objectivity. Taken together, this research—on implicit racial bias, the ‘brain disease’ model of addiction, and the ‘criminal brain’—casts the brain as a moral scapegoat, allowing us to show mercy towards individuals without grappling with collective responsibility for the conditions of injustice at the heart of racism, addiction, and crime. Finally, I discuss recommendations for neuroscientific and psychological inquiry that is attentive to non-neural explanations and responsive to how the science of the brain is translated and communicated into broader society.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).