Methodology of Metrics: Analyzing the Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria
The Environmental, Social and Governance criteria, better known as ESG, is now a well-known concept to almost half the world. It is also described as ‘an alternate asset class’ and that is self-explanatory of the large size of the asset pool. ESG is a set of metrics that measures an organization’s behaviour towards the environment and how it fares on the social and governance side. Carbon emissions, waste disposal techniques, employee relations, management quality and at least forty more metrics are examples of this. Financial services organization Bloomberg has stated that ESG assets may hit fifty-three trillion dollars by 2025, and that will roughly be one-third of the Global assets under management. Conscious investors use this criterion to invest in organizations that are perceived to be sustainable and growth-oriented. This criterion, despite being a significant breakthrough in investors’ behaviour and argued to be having a positive impact on an organization’s value is still nebulous and vaguely defined. Based on the research done on ESG metrics and their impact, it has been pointed out numerous times that the metrics still suffer by not being standardized and the ESG reports being readily available, leading to misinterpretation of data. The study aims to look into this idea of ESG metrics and try to analyze why ESG metrics might be inconsistent and why there is a need to standardize them.
Keywords: metrics, ESG, criteria, inconsistencies, data, standards, research
Copyright (c) 2022 Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).