General Insights From: "The Intellectual Dark-Web"
A Case Study of Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro
There reaches a point when tradition and antiquated ideology is relied on too heavily in crafting opinions, so as to obfuscate intellectual progression. This has historically been the result of authoritative governance and infallible religious maxim — along with less acute reasons — and although in modernity, the marketplace of ideas is much broader than it once was, this problem is still quite prevalent today, just for less apparent reasons. Such is the case when examining the current movement known colloquially as “The Intellectual Dark-Web” — a virtual network of self-proclaimed cultural critics, who host a variety of media within the realm of online pseudo-academia (Weiss & Winter, 2018). This group has become ubiquitous within the modern zeitgeist on platforms such as YouTube and Twitter, on which they can be watched for hours espousing conservative doctrine to their predominantly male, adolescent audience in hopes of maintaining the status quo, and eschewing activism (Weiss & Winter, 2018). There are quite a number of figures in this group; however, this paper will be focusing primarily on the two most notable members: Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro. What this paper will be attempting to uncover are some of the underlying reasons why such a group had the ability to attain such scholarly prominence in the West, and further, how this ultimately reflects ominous traits of our culture. The three correlates explicated to illuminate the scope of this issue are as follows: The creation of political binaries assisted by technology, the predilection for sensationalized media, and the West's cultural aversion to change. Moreover, after elucidating the transparent agendas of those of whom delivery and filtrate information to us, one may then be better equipped in understanding the conventions of Western politics critically rather than reflexively, and moreover, approach figures like Peterson and Shapiro openly, without the exogenous pressures of our milieu.
Copyright (c) 2021 Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).