Peace, Love, and Conspiracy Theories: How Experiences and Worldviews Shape Age Cohorts' Views of Science
Abstract
Whether the safety of vaccines, climate change, or COVID-19, the origins of science skepticism appear the same: When misinformation prevails and individual liberties appear threatened, people will resist. Who are today's science skeptics and what motivates their beliefs? I argue that older populations are the most likely age cohort to oppose mainstream scientific consensus, based upon their collective memories of mid-century scientific events and latent changes to US public school science curricula. Evidence also suggests a relationship between motivated cognition and conspiracist thinking linked to older age groups' worldviews and preferred social media platforms. To test hypotheses, regression models analyzed data from an existing survey in which participants (N = 2,002) were asked a series of questions on scientific topics. Results suggest a relationship between age and certain views of science, particularly among oldest and youngest age cohorts. Views are also relative to experiences and perceptions developed during age cohorts' formative years. Religion, partisanship, and education level also matter for select scientific topics and findings indicate the interplay of factors responsible for certain age cohorts' views of science.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).