The Power of 140 Characters? #IranElection and Social Movements in Web 2.0
Keywords: Social Media, Social Movements, Political Protests, Twitter Revolution, Twitter
AbstractThis paper analyzes the role of the micro-blogging site Twitter during the contested 2009 Iranian presidential election. It considers just what it means to call the Iranian case a “Twitter Revolution” and relies upon a body of literature discussing netwar, online activism, social media, and social movements. It concludes that a social medium such as Twitter can assist the spread of information and thereby counter the censorship of an authoritarian state, yet may fail to assist citizens of an oppressive regime from physically mobilizing within the country. Ultimately, the Iranian case illustrates that it is through interactions between old and new, between traditional media and micro-blogging, between on-the-ground protests and online activism, that social media like Twitter may contribute on the global stage.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).