Stanford University Student Journals · Open Journal Systems

Ten years of Stanford student-led scholarly publishing, by the numbers

Every article on this platform is written by Stanford students, published by Stanford students, and put through peer review by Stanford students — with student editors and production teams running the whole operation. This is a retrospective on the growth and reach that student-run publishing has achieved on Stanford's OJS platform, running continuously since 2008, with the last decade showing the sharpest acceleration.

1,003
Student-written articles published, all-time
3,674
Total student submissions received
24,137
Registered platform users — mostly Stanford students, as authors, reviewers, and editors
31
Active student editors, last 6 months

Submissions and publication, 2016 – 2026

Total incoming submissions from Stanford students vs. articles that made it through student-run peer review to publication, by year. 2026 is year-to-date (through September) and has already passed several full prior years.

Submissions received
Published
View as table
YearSubmissionsPublished

Readership is compounding

Total usage-stats events (abstract views + full-text downloads) recorded across all student journals, by year. 2026's year-to-date total already exceeds all of 2025.

View as table
YearReadership events

A caution on these totals: OJS filters known bots, but newer AI agents often disguise themselves as regular browsers to dodge that filter. Some of the 2024–2026 growth may reflect this kind of automated traffic, not just human readers.

Run entirely by students

What it takes to get 1,003 student-written articles published: student editors assigning the work, and willing student reviewers reading it closely enough to send it back better.

2,069
Review assignments issued to student reviewers
1,126
Peer reviews completed by students
750
Individual students who've completed a review
4,805
Students who enrolled as reviewers

15 student journals with published work

Article output by student journal, ranked. Intersect — the platform's flagship, run entirely by Stanford undergraduates — accounts for nearly half of all articles ever published on the system.

Most read and cited articles

Abstract views and full-text downloads since tracking began in 2014, alongside academic citations from Google Scholar, gathered by hand from per-journal searches on October 27, 2026 (a dash means Scholar has no record of the article). Click a column header to sort.

291
articles with a verified citation
1,657
total citations across those articles
6 / 8
Intersect's official Google Scholar h5-index / h5-median

A caution on the view counts: OJS filters known bots, but newer AI agents often disguise themselves as regular browsers to dodge that filter, so views — and to a lesser extent downloads — may be somewhat inflated by automated AI traffic.

Source: Readership figures come from OJS's built-in COUNTER-based usage statistics, tracked since 2014. "Active editors" excludes platform admin/test accounts and counts users holding an editorial-tier role (Journal Manager, Editor-in-Chief, Section Editor, Journal Editor, Production Editor, Editorial Board Member, or Guest Editor) who logged in within the last 6 months. All-time earliest submission on record: 2008-06-04. Citation data sourced from Google Scholar: per-journal site: searches paged through and saved by hand on October 27, 2026, with each result matched to the OJS database by its article URL.