The Hung Jury: Scholarly Consensus on the Value of the CSI Effect in the Future of American Justice
Keywords:
CSI effect, cultivation processAbstract
The alleged "CSI Effect" is a sociological phenomenon that claims—based on Gerbner and Gross's cultivation process theory—that the large percentage of the American public that regularly watch forensic crime television programs will have unrealistic expectations regarding the nature of forensic evidence when selected for a real-life jury. How the effect influences Constitutional interpretation and sways researchers and judicial actors will, in turn, change the lives of every American. The inherent difficulties in directly linking the possible cause and effect have resulted in intense dispute over the existence of such an effect, and a wide spectrum of judgments regarding the value and future of the CSI effect in the American judicial system. While the CSI effect may not encompass the specific symptoms decried by attorneys, these shows are indeed affecting the legal process, to the extent that today's attorneys have adjusted their tactics, and states have directly addressed the effect in their guidelines for courtroom protocol. This paper sets out to survey the current body of research and to determine if there is consensus regarding whether the CSI effect is a negative influence on the criminal courts and whether there is any agreement on how to counteract it.Downloads
Published
2010-10-25
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).